Title

Effect of decision support on missed opportunities for human papillomavirus vaccination.

Year of Publication

2014

Number of Pages

734-44

Date Published

2014 Dec

ISSN Number

1873-2607

Abstract

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Missed opportunities for human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination are common, presenting a barrier to achieving widespread vaccine coverage and preventing infection.</p>

<p><strong>PURPOSE: </strong>To compare the impact of clinician- versus family-focused decision support, none, or both on captured opportunities for HPV vaccination.</p>

<p><strong>DESIGN: </strong>Twelve-month cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in 2010-2011.</p>

<p><strong>SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: </strong>Adolescent girls aged 11-17 years due for HPV Dose 1, 2, or 3 receiving care at primary care practices.</p>

<p><strong>INTERVENTION: </strong>Twenty-two primary care practices were cluster randomized to receive a three-part clinician-focused intervention (educational sessions, electronic health record-based alerts, and performance feedback) or none. Within each practice, girls were randomized at the patient level to receive family-focused, automated, educational phone calls or none. Randomization resulted in four groups: clinician-focused, family-focused, combined, or no intervention.</p>

<p><strong>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: </strong>Standardized proportions of captured opportunities (due vaccine received at clinician visit) were calculated among girls in each study arm. Analyses were conducted in 2013.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Among 17,016 adolescent girls and their 32,472 visits (14,247 preventive, 18,225 acute), more HPV opportunities were captured at preventive than acute visits (36% vs 4%, p&lt;0.001). At preventive visits, the clinician intervention increased captured opportunities by 9 percentage points for HPV-1 and 6 percentage points for HPV-3 (p≤0.01), but not HPV-2. At acute visits, the clinician and combined interventions significantly improved captured opportunities for all three doses (p≤0.01). The family intervention was similar to none. Results differed by practice setting; at preventive visits, the clinician intervention was more effective for HPV-1 in suburban than urban settings, whereas at acute visits, the clinician intervention was more effective for all doses at urban practices.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Clinician-focused decision support is a more effective strategy than family-focused to prevent missed HPV vaccination opportunities. Given the persistence of missed opportunities even in intervention groups, complementary strategies are needed. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01159093.</p>

DOI

10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.010

Alternate Title

Am J Prev Med

PMID

25455116

WATCH THIS PAGE

Subscription is not available for this page.