First name
James
Middle name
N
Last name
Brenton

Title

Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Year of Publication

2021

Number of Pages

e613-e625

Date Published

2021 12 01

ISSN Number

1529-7535

Abstract

<p><strong>OBJECTIVES: </strong>To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients.</p>

<p><strong>DESIGN: </strong>Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019.</p>

<p><strong>SETTING: </strong>Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States.</p>

<p><strong>PATIENTS: </strong>We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups.</p>

<p><strong>INTERVENTIONS: </strong>None.</p>

<p><strong>MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: </strong>We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3-9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55-491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3-120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5-1,255 min] vs 150 min [90-318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58-368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4-5.9 hr]; p &lt; 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5-40 d] vs [1.8-8.8 d]; p &lt; 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p &lt; 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p &lt; 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.</p>

DOI

10.1097/PCC.0000000000002786

Alternate Title

Pediatr Crit Care Med

PMID

34120133

WATCH THIS PAGE

Subscription is not available for this page.