Burden of Pediatric Heart Failure in the United States.

2022

1917-1928

05/2022

1558-3597

BACKGROUND: There are currently limited accurate national estimates for pediatric heart failure (HF).

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the current burden of primary and comorbid pediatric HF in the United States.

METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification codes were used to identify HF cases and comorbidities from the Kids' Inpatient Database, National Inpatient Sample, National Emergency Department (ED) Sample, and National Vital Statistics System for 2012 and 2016. To describe HF events, all visits/events among pediatric and adult subjects were included in the analysis. HF events were classified into 1 of 3 groups: 1) no HF; 2) primary HF; or 3) comorbid HF. We compared patients with and without HF and calculated unique event rates with age and sex standardization.

RESULTS: Congenital heart disease, conduction disorders/arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy were responsible for the majority of pediatric HF-related ED visits and hospitalizations. Compared to 2012, in 2016, there was an increase in comorbid HF ED visits (rate ratio: 1.93; P < 0.001) and primary HF hospitalizations (rate ratio: 1.14; P = 0.002). Pediatric HF burden was lower compared to adult HF; however, deaths in the ED and in-hospital were significantly more likely in children presenting with HF than adults.

CONCLUSIONS: The burden of pediatric HF continues to increase. Compared to adults with HF presenting to the ED and in-hospital, outcomes are inferior and per patient resource use is higher for children hospitalized with HF. National initiatives to understand risk factors for morbidity and mortality in pediatric HF and continued surveillance and mitigation of preventable risk factors may attenuate this uptrend.

10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.336

J Am Coll Cardiol

35550689

Fifth Annual Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) Report.

2021

2021 Oct 11

1552-6259

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) provides detailed information on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs).</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>From September 19, 2012 to December 31, 2020 there were 1,229 devices in 1,011 patients reported to the registry from 47 North American Hospitals in patients under 19 years of age.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Cardiomyopathy was the most common underlying etiology (58%), followed by congenital heart disease (CHD) (25%) and myocarditis (10%). The most common devices implanted were implantable continuous (IC) (n=419, 41%), followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP) (n=269, 27%), paracorporeal continuous (PC) (n=263, 26%), and percutaneous (n=53, 5%). Overall, at six months after VAD implantation, 83% had a positive outcome (transplant, explant, or alive on device). The freedom from stroke was highest in IC VADs (93% at 3-months), compared to PP VADs (84% at 3-months) and with PC VADs (75% at 3-months. There were differences in survival by device type with patients on IC VADs having the best overall survival and those on PC having the lowest overall survival, though the patient populations being supported by each VAD type differed significantly from each other.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>This Fifth Pedimacs Report demonstrates the continued robust growth of VADs in the pediatric community, now with over 1000 patients reported to the registry. The multiple available device types (PC, PP, IC) serve different populations with different pre-VAD risk profiles, which may account for differences in survival and AE between device types.</p>

10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.10.001

Ann Thorac Surg

34648810

Association of low center performance evaluations and pediatric heart transplant center behavior in the United States.

2021

2021 Apr 22

1557-3117

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>To date, no study has evaluated the effects of low center performance evaluations (CPE) on pediatric heart transplant center behavior. We sought to assess the impact of low CPE flags on pediatric heart transplant center listing and transplant volumes and center recipient and donor characteristics.</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>We included centers performing at least 10 pediatric (age &lt;18 years) transplants during the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients reporting period January 2009-June 2011 and evaluated consecutive biannual program specific reports until the last reporting period January 2016-June 2018. We evaluated changes in center behavior at following time points: a year before flagging, a year and two years after the flag; and at last reporting period.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>During our study period, 24 pediatric centers were non-flagged and 6 were flagged. Compared to non-flagged centers, there was a decline in candidate listings in flagged centers at the last reporting period (mean increase of 5.5 ± 12.4 listings vs"?&gt; mean decrease of 14.0 ± 14.9 listings; p&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003). Similarly, the number of transplants declined in flagged centers (mean increase of 2.6 ± 9.6 transplants vs"?&gt; mean decrease of 10.0 ± 12.8 transplants; p&nbsp;=&nbsp;.012). Flagged centers had declines in listings for patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy, re-transplant, renal dysfunction, those on mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There was no significant change in donor characteristics between flagged and non-flagged centers.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Low CPE may have unintended negative consequences on center behavior leading to declines in listing and transplant volumes and potentially leading to decreased listing for higher risk recipients.</p>

10.1016/j.healun.2021.04.008

J Heart Lung Transplant

34078559