First name
Antara
Last name
Mondal

Title

Sex Differences in Left Ventricular Assist Device-related Emergency Department Encounters in the United States.

Year of Publication

2022

Number of Pages

1445-1455

Date Published

05/2022

ISSN Number

1532-8414

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding sex differences in the profiles and outcomes of ambulatory patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support who present to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 57,200 LVAD-related ED patient encounters from the 2010 to 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes identified patients aged 18 years or older with LVADs and associated primary and comorbidity diagnoses. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were stratified by sex and compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of hospital admission and death. Female patient encounters comprised 27.2% of ED visits and occurred at younger ages and more frequently with obesity and depression (all P < .01). There were no sex differences in presentation for device complication, stroke, infection, or heart failure (all P > .05); however, female patient encounters were more often respiratory- and genitourinary or gynecological related (both P < .01). After adjustment for age group, diabetes, depression, and hypertension, male patient encounters had a 38% increased odds of hospital admission (95% confidence interval 1.20-1.58), but there was no sex difference in the adjusted odds of death (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.45).

CONCLUSIONS: Patient encounters of females on LVAD support have significantly different comorbidities and outcomes compared with males. Further inquiry into these sex differences is imperative to improve long-term outcomes.

DOI

10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.05.005

Alternate Title

J Card Fail

PMID

35644307
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

Novel Risk Model to Predict Emergency Department Associated Mortality for Patients Supported With a Ventricular Assist Device: The Emergency Department-Ventricular Assist Device Risk Score.

Year of Publication

2022

Number of Pages

e020942

Date Published

2022 Jan 13

ISSN Number

2047-9980

Abstract

<p><strong>Background</strong> The past decade has seen tremendous growth in patients with ambulatory ventricular assist devices. We sought to identify patients that present to the emergency department (ED) at the highest risk of death. <strong>Methods and Results</strong> This retrospective analysis of ED encounters from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample includes 2010 to 2017. Using a random sampling of patient encounters, 80% were assigned to development and 20% to validation cohorts. A risk model was derived from independent predictors of mortality. Each patient encounter was assigned to 1 of 3 groups based on risk score. A total of 44&nbsp;042 ED ventricular assist device patient encounters were included. The majority of patients were male (73.6%), &lt;65&nbsp;years old (60.1%), and 29% presented with bleeding, stroke, or device complication. Independent predictors of mortality during the ED visit or subsequent admission included age ≥65&nbsp;years (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-4.6), primary diagnoses (stroke [OR, 19.4; 95% CI, 13.1-28.8], device complication [OR, 10.1; 95% CI, 6.5-16.7], cardiac [OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.7-6.1], infection [OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 3.5-8.9]), and blood transfusion (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8-4.0), whereas history of hypertension was protective (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9). The risk score predicted mortality areas under the curve of 0.78 and 0.71 for development and validation. Encounters in the highest risk score strata had a 16-fold higher mortality compared with the lowest risk group (15.8% versus 1.0%). <strong>Conclusions</strong> We present a novel risk score and its validation for predicting mortality of patients with ED ventricular assist devices, a high-risk, and growing, population.</p>

DOI

10.1161/JAHA.121.020942

Alternate Title

J Am Heart Assoc

PMID

35023355
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

Impact of Age on Emergency Resource Utilization and Outcomes in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients Supported with a Ventricular Assist Device.

Year of Publication

2021

Number of Pages

Date Published

2021 Nov 03

ISSN Number

1538-943X

Abstract

<p>There are minimal data describing outcomes in ambulatory pediatric and young adult ventricular assist device (VAD)-supported patient populations. We performed a retrospective analysis of encounter-level data from 2006 to 2017 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) to compare emergency department (ED) resource utilization and outcomes for pediatric (≤18 years, n = 494) to young adult (19-29 years, n = 2,074) VAD-supported patient encounters. Pediatric encounters were more likely to have a history of congenital heart disease (11.3% vs. 4.8%). However, Pediatric encounters had lower admission/transfer rates (37.8% vs. 57.8%) and median charges ($3,334 (IQR $1,473-$19,818) vs. $13,673 ($3,331-$45,884)) (all p &lt; 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression modeling revealed that age itself was not a predictor of admission, instead high acuity primary diagnoses and medical complexity were: (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence intervals): cardiac (3.0; 1.6-5.4), infection (3.4; 1.7-6.5), bleeding (3.9; 1.7-8.8), device complication (7.2; 2.7-18.9), and ≥1 chronic comorbidity (4.1; 2.5-6.7). In this largest study to date describing ED resource use and outcomes for pediatric and young adult VAD-supported patients, we found that, rather than age, high acuity presentations and comorbidities were primary drivers of clinical outcomes. Thus, reducing morbidity in this population should target comorbidities and early recognition of VAD-related complications.</p>

DOI

10.1097/MAT.0000000000001603

Alternate Title

ASAIO J

PMID

34743138
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

Mental Health Disorders and Emergency Resource Use and Outcomes in Ventricular Assist Device Supported Patients.

Year of Publication

2021

Number of Pages

Date Published

2021 Jun 02

ISSN Number

1097-6744

Abstract

<p>There are limited data describing the prevalence of mental health disorders (MHDOs) in patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs), or associations between MHDOs and resource use or outcomes. We used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample administrative database to analyze 44,041 ED encounters for VAD-supported adults from 2010 to 2017, to assess the relationship between MHDOs and outcomes in this population. MHDO diagnoses were present for 23% of encounters, and were associated with higher charges and rates of admission, but lower mortality.</p>

DOI

10.1016/j.ahj.2021.05.018

Alternate Title

Am Heart J

PMID

34089695
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

An Increasing Burden of Disease: Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices From 2010 to 2017.

Year of Publication

2021

Number of Pages

e018035

Date Published

2021 Feb 05

ISSN Number

2047-9980

Abstract

<p>Background With a growing population of patients supported by ventricular assist devices (VADs) and the improvement in survival of this patient population, understanding the healthcare system burden is critical to improving outcomes. Thus, we sought to examine national estimates of VAD-related emergency department (ED) visits and characterize their demographic, clinical, and outcomes profile. Additionally, we tested the hypotheses that resource use increased and mortality improved over time. Methods and Results This retrospective database analysis uses encounter-level data from the 2010 to 2017 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. The primary outcome was mortality. From 2010 to 2017, &gt;880&nbsp;million ED visits were evaluated, with 44&nbsp;042 VAD-related ED visits identified. The annual mean visits were 5505 (SD 4258), but increased 16-fold from 2010 to 2017 (824 versus 13&nbsp;155). VAD-related ED visits frequently resulted in admission (72%) and/or death (3.0%). Median inflation-adjusted charges were $25&nbsp;679 (interquartile range, $7450, $63&nbsp;119) per encounter. The most common primary diagnoses were cardiac (22%), and almost 30% of encounters were because of bleeding, stroke, or device complications. From 2010 to 2017, admission and mortality decreased from 82% to 71% and 3.4% to 2.4%, respectively ( for trends &lt;0.001, both). Conclusions We present the first study using national-level data to characterize the growing ED resource use and financial burden of patients supported by VAD. During the past decade, admission and mortality rates decreased but remain substantial; in 2017 ≈1 in every 40 VAD ED encounters resulted in death, making it critical that clinical decision-making be optimized for patients with VAD to maximize good outcomes.</p>

DOI

10.1161/JAHA.120.018035

Alternate Title

J Am Heart Assoc

PMID

33543642
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

Comparing Resource Use and Outcomes between Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices and Orthotopic Heart Transplant in the United States from 2006-2014: A Nationally Representative Sample of Emergency Department Visits.

Year of Publication

2020

Number of Pages

S151

Date Published

2020 Apr

ISSN Number

1557-3117

Abstract

<p><b>PURPOSE: </b>With advances in mechanical circulatory support and orthotopic heart transplants (OHT) remaining a limited resource, there has been a dramatic increase in Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) implantation. There is minimal data comparing emergency department (ED) resource utilization and outcomes between these populations. We examined national estimates of VAD and OHT-related ED visits and evaluated admissions, resource utilization, and mortality.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>This study is an epidemiological analysis comparing national estimates of ED visit-level data from the 2006-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) in patients with VADs vs OHT, identified using ICD-9 codes. The primary outcome was death; secondary outcomes included median inflation-adjusted charge and hospital admission. We tested the hypothesis that resource utilization and mortality are higher in ED visits for VAD patients compared to OHT patients.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>17,356 VAD-related ED, and 138,133 OHT-related visits were identified. Patients with VADs were more likely to be male (74% vs 70%, p=0.001) and ≥ 65 yo (39% vs 38%, p=0.0004). VADs were more likely to have a primary diagnosis of bleeding (25% vs 2%) and less likely to have acute respiratory disease (6% vs 20%, p<0.0001 for both). VAD-related ED visits had higher rates of inpatient admission or transfer (73% vs 57%) and a higher mortality rate (4.7% vs 1.8%) than patients with OHT (p <0.0001 for all). Moreover, VAD related ED visits had higher median inflation-adjusted charges [$23,862 (IQR $7,129-$58,265) vs $11,364 (IQR $3,001-$31,694)] (p<0.0001).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>Patients with VADs presenting to the ED represent a population with greater morbidity, mortality and resource utilization compared to OHT. A more developed understanding of those factors that drive mortality and resource use is imperative for improving outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>

DOI

10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.1085

Alternate Title

J. Heart Lung Transplant.

PMID

32464925
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

Epidemiology of Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices Presenting to the Emergency Room from 2006-2014.

Year of Publication

2020

Number of Pages

S334

Date Published

2020 Apr

ISSN Number

1557-3117

Abstract

<p><b>PURPOSE: </b>Data related to the epidemiology and resource utilization of ventricular assist device (VAD) related emergency department (ED) visits are limited. However, an improved understanding of the burden of VADs on the healthcare system is critical to designing interventions that improve outcomes. We examined national estimates of VAD-related ED visits and described medical complexity, admissions, resource utilization, and mortality.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>This study utilizes data from ED encounter-level data via the 2006-2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). ICD-9 codes were used to identify patient-encounters with VADs. Demographic and clinical factors are reported via descriptive statistics. The primary outcome was death; secondary outcomes included median inflation-adjusted charge and hospital admission.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>From 2006 to 2014, over 900 million ED visits were evaluated, of which 17,356 (.002%) VAD-related ED visits were identified, for a median of 1,028 (SD 1,489) visits per year. Most VAD ED encounters were represented by patients that were male (74%), ≥ 45 years old (73%), and living in an urban environment (85%). 73% of VAD related ED visits resulted in inpatient admission and the median inflation-adjusted charge was $23,862 (IQR 7,129; 58,265) per visit. Mortality, either in the ED or during an associated admission, was 4.7%. The most common primary diagnoses were cardiac (32%) followed by bleeding (25%) and infection (18%). More than half of the encounters were with patients with ≥1 chronic medical condition, with diabetes (34%) and hypertension (31%) the most prevalent.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>This is the first study to use national level data to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with VADs who present to the ED. With nearly 1 in 20 VAD ED encounters resulting in death, strategies to reduce mortality are urgently needed.</p>

DOI

10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.362

Alternate Title

J. Heart Lung Transplant.

PMID

32465439
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image

Title

Age-Dependent Emergency Department Resource Utilization in Patients with a Ventricular Assist Device.

Year of Publication

2020

Number of Pages

S465

Date Published

2020 Apr

ISSN Number

1557-3117

Abstract

<p><b>PURPOSE: </b>There are minimal data on emergency department (ED) resource utilization for pediatric patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs), and it is unclear if adult data can be extrapolated to children.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>This analysis of national estimates of ED-visit level encounters uses the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Patients from 2006 to 2014 with VADs were identified using ICD-9 codes and categorized as pediatric (≤18y), young adult (19-44y), middle adult (45-64y) and older adult (≥65y). The primary outcome was death; secondary outcomes included median inflation adjusted charge, admission/transfer rate, and primary encounter diagnoses.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>Over the 9 years studied, a total of 254 (95% CI 190-318) pediatric, 3,003 (95% CI 2424-3582) young adult, 7,590 (95% CI 6220-8961) middle adult, and 6,857 (95% CI 5604-8110) older adult ED encounters were identified. Compared to all other age groups, the pediatric VAD ED encounters were more likely to occur at a non-teaching or non-metropolitan ED, to have private insurance as a primary payer, and have a higher proportion of female patients (p ≤ 0.0003 for all). The two most frequent primary encounter diagnoses in pediatric patients were acute gastrointestinal (19%) and respiratory complaints (14%), both of which were uncommon in all adult age groups (p < 0.0001). Admission/transfer rate and charges were significantly lower for pediatric VAD ED encounters (p < 0.0001 for both, Figure). In contrast, overall inpatient and ED mortality did not differ (1.7% vs. 2.3% to 5.3%, p > 0.2 for all).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>In this study evaluating ED resource utilization of VAD patients, pediatric patients had much lower admission rate and charges compared to their adult counterparts-likely reflecting generally lower acuity complaints or potentially less medical complexity. Still, high mortality rates across all ages highlights the ubiquitous fragility of patients with VADs presenting to the ED and the need for strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality.</p>

DOI

10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.318

Alternate Title

J. Heart Lung Transplant.

PMID

32465817
Inner Banner
Publication Image
Inner Banner
Publication Image