PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine variation in genetic testing between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across hospitals over time.

METHODS: We performed a multicenter large-scale retrospective cohort study using NICU discharge data from the Pediatric Hospital Information System database between 2016 and 2021. We analyzed the variation in the percentage of NICU patients who had any genetic testing across hospitals and over time. We used a multivariable multilevel logistic regression model to investigate the potential association between patient characteristics and genetic testing.

RESULTS: The final analysis included 207,228 neonates from 38 hospitals. Overall, 13% of patients had at least 1 genetic test sent, although this varied from 4% to 50% across hospitals. Over the study period, the proportion of patients tested increased, with the increase disproportionately borne by hospitals already testing high proportions of patients. On average, patients who received genetic testing had higher illness severity. Controlling for severity, however, only minimally reduced the degree of hospital-level variation in genetic testing.

CONCLUSION: The percentage of NICU patients who undergo genetic testing varies among hospitals and increasingly so over time. Variation is largely unexplained by differences in severity between hospitals. The degree of variation suggests that clearer guidelines for NICU genetic testing are warranted.

<p><strong>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: </strong>Genetic testing is expanding among ill neonates, yet the influence of genetic results on medical decision-making is not clear. With this study, we sought to determine how different types of genetic information with uncertain implications for prognosis influence clinicians' decisions to recommend intensive versus palliative care.</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>We conducted a national study of neonatologists using a split sample experimental design. The questionnaire contained 4 clinical vignettes. Participants were randomly assigned to see one of 2 versions that varied only regarding whether they included the following genetic findings: (1) a variant of uncertain significance; (2) a genetic diagnosis that affects neurodevelopment but not acute survival; (3) a genetic versus nongenetic etiology of equally severe pathology; (4) a pending genetic testing result. Physicians answered questions about recommendations they would make for the patient described in each vignette.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Vignette versions that included a variant of uncertain significance, a diagnosis foreshadowing neurodevelopmental impairment, or a genetic etiology of disease were all associated with an increased likelihood of recommending palliative rather than intensive care. A pending genetic test result did not have a significant effect on care recommendations.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Findings from this study of hypothetical cases suggest neonatologists apply uncertain genetic findings or those that herald neurodevelopmental disability in problematic ways. As genetic testing expands, understanding how it is used in decision-making and educating clinicians regarding appropriate use are paramount.</p>

<p>Ciliopathy syndromes are a diverse spectrum of disease characterized by a combination of cystic kidney disease, hepatobiliary disease, retinopathy, skeletal dysplasia, developmental delay, and brain malformations. Though generally divided into distinct disease categories based on the pattern of system involvement, ciliopathy syndromes are known to display certain phenotypic overlap. We performed next-generation sequencing panel testing, clinical exome sequencing, and research-based exome sequencing reanalysis on patients with suspected ciliopathy syndromes with additional features. We identified biallelic pathogenic variants in BBS1 in a child with features of cranioectodermal dysplasia, and biallelic variants in BBS12 in a child with the clinical stigmata of Bardet-Biedl syndrome, but also with anal atresia. We additionally identified biallelic pathogenic variants in WDR35 and DYNC2H1 in children with predominant liver disease and ductal plate malformation without skeletal dysplasia. Our study highlights the phenotypic and genetic diversity of ciliopathy syndromes, the importance of considering ciliopathy syndromes as a disease-spectrum and screening for all associated complications in all patients, and describes exclusive extra-skeletal manifestations in two classical skeletal dysplasia syndromes.</p>