Quality improvement project to reduce pediatric clear liquid fasting times prior to anesthesia.

2019

698-704

2019 07

1460-9592

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Unnecessarily long preprocedural fasting can cause suffering and distress for children and their families. Institutional fasting policies are designed to consistently achieve minimum fasting times, often without regard to the extent to which actual fasting times exceed these minimums. Children at our hospital frequently experienced clear liquid fasting times far in excess of required minimums.</p>

<p><strong>AIMS: </strong>The aim of this study was to&nbsp;utilize quality improvement methodology to reduce excess fasting times, with a goal of achieving experienced clear liquid fasting times ≤4&nbsp;hours for 60% of our patients.</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>This quality improvement project was conducted between July 2017 and August 2018. A multidisciplinary team performed a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles focused on children undergoing elective procedures at a large children's hospital. Key drivers for clear liquid fasting times and relevant balancing measures were identified. Data were analyzed using control charts and statistical process control methods.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Approximately 16&nbsp;000 children were involved in this project. Over the course of the project, the percentage of children with goal clear liquid fasting times improved from the baseline of 20%-63%, with a change in the mean fasting time from 9&nbsp;hours to 6&nbsp;hours. There were no significant effects on balancing measures (case delays/cancellations and clinically significant aspiration events).</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSION: </strong>Using quality improvement methodology, we safely improved the duration of preoperative fasting experienced by our patients. Our results provide additional data supporting the safety of more permissive 1-hour clear liquid fasting minimums. We suggest other institutions pursue similar efforts to improve patient and family experience.</p>

10.1111/pan.13661

Paediatr Anaesth

31070840

Development and Implementation of a Bedside Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Service in a PICU.

2019

71-78

2019 01

1529-7535

<p><strong>OBJECTIVES: </strong>To create a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service to increase placement of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter in PICU patients.</p>

<p><strong>DESIGN: </strong>Two-phase observational, pre-post design.</p>

<p><strong>SETTING: </strong>Single-center quaternary noncardiac PICU.</p>

<p><strong>PATIENTS: </strong>All patients admitted to the PICU.</p>

<p><strong>INTERVENTIONS: </strong>From June 1, 2015, to May 31, 2017, a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service team was created (phase I) and expanded (phase II) as part of a quality improvement initiative. A multidisciplinary team developed a PICU peripherally inserted central catheter evaluation tool to identify amenable patients and to suggest location and provider for procedure performance. Outcome, process, and balancing metrics were evaluated.</p>

<p><strong>MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: </strong>Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service placed 130 of 493 peripherally inserted central catheter (26%) resulting in 2,447 hospital central catheter days. A shift in bedside peripherally inserted central catheter centerline proportion occurred during both phases. Median time from order to catheter placement was reduced for peripherally inserted central catheters placed by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service compared with placement in interventional radiology (6 hr [interquartile range, 2-23 hr] vs 34 hr [interquartile range, 19-61 hr]; p &lt; 0.001). Successful access was achieved by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service providers in 96% of patients with central tip position in 97%. Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service central line-associated bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism rates were similar to rates for peripherally inserted central catheters placed in interventional radiology (all central line-associated bloodstream infection, 1.23 vs 2.18; p = 0.37 and venous thromboembolism, 1.63 vs 1.57; p = 0.91). Peripherally inserted central catheters in PICU patients had reduced in-hospital venous thromboembolism rate compared with PICU temporary catheter in PICU rate (1.59 vs 5.36; p &lt; 0.001).</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service implementation increased bedside peripherally inserted central catheter placement and employed a patient-centered and timely process. Balancing metrics including central line-associated bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism rates were not significantly different between peripherally inserted central catheters placed by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service and those placed in interventional radiology.</p>

10.1097/PCC.0000000000001739

Pediatr Crit Care Med

30234675