First name
Thomas
Middle name
W
Last name
Conlon

Title

Impaired echocardiographic left ventricular global longitudinal strain after pediatric cardiac arrest children is associated with mortality.

Year of Publication

2023

Number of Pages

109936

Date Published

08/2023

ISSN Number

1873-1570

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is an echocardiographic method to identify left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after cardiac arrest that is less sensitive to loading conditions. We aimed to identify the frequency of impaired GLS following pediatric cardiac arrest, and its association with hospital mortality.

METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of children <18 years of age treated in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) after in- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA and OHCA), with echocardiogram performed within 24 hours of initiation of post-arrest PICU care between 2013 and 2020. Patients with congenital heart disease, post-arrest extracorporeal support, or inability to measure GLS were excluded. Echocardiographic LV ejection fraction (EF) and shortening fraction (SF) were abstracted from the chart. GLS was measured post hoc; impaired strain was defined as LV GLS ≥ 2 SD worse than age-dependent normative values. Demographics and pre-arrest, arrest, and post-arrest characteristics were compared between subjects with normal versus impaired GLS. Correlation between GLS, SF and EF were calculated with Pearson comparison. Logistic regression tested the association of GLS with mortality. Area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) was calculated for discriminative utility of GLS, EF, and SF with mortality.

RESULTS: GLS was measured in 124 subjects; impaired GLS was present in 46 (37.1%). Subjects with impaired GLS were older (median 7.9 vs. 1.9 years, p < 0.001), more likely to have ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation as initial rhythm (19.6% versus 3.8%, p = 0.017) and had higher peak troponin levels in the first 24 hours post-arrest (median 2.5 vs. 0.5, p = 0.002). There were no differences between arrest location or CPR duration by GLS groups. Subjects with impaired GLS compared to normal GLS had lower median EF (42.6% versus 62.3%) and median SF (23.3% versus 36.6%), all p < 0.001, with strong inverse correlation between GLS and EF (rho -0.76, p < 0.001) and SF (rho -0.71, p < 0.001). Patients with impaired GLS had higher rates of mortality (60% vs. 32%, p = 0.009). GLS was associated with mortality when controlling for age and initial rhythm [aOR 1.17 per 1% increase in GLS (95% CI 1.09-1.26), p < 0.001]. GLS, EF and SF had similar discrimination for mortality: GLS AUROC 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.79); EF AUROC 0.71 (95% CI 0.58-0.88); SF AUROC 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.82), p = 0.101.

CONCLUSIONS: Impaired LV function as measured by GLS after pediatric cardiac arrest is associated with hospital mortality. GLS is a novel complementary metric to traditional post-arrest echocardiography that correlates strongly with EF and SF and is associated with mortality. Future large prospective studies of post-cardiac arrest care should investigate the prognostic utilities of GLS, alongside SF and EF.

DOI

10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109936

Alternate Title

Resuscitation

PMID

37574003
Featured Publication
No

Title

Development and Implementation of a Bedside Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Service in a PICU.

Year of Publication

2019

Number of Pages

71-78

Date Published

2019 01

ISSN Number

1529-7535

Abstract

<p><strong>OBJECTIVES: </strong>To create a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service to increase placement of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter in PICU patients.</p>

<p><strong>DESIGN: </strong>Two-phase observational, pre-post design.</p>

<p><strong>SETTING: </strong>Single-center quaternary noncardiac PICU.</p>

<p><strong>PATIENTS: </strong>All patients admitted to the PICU.</p>

<p><strong>INTERVENTIONS: </strong>From June 1, 2015, to May 31, 2017, a bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service team was created (phase I) and expanded (phase II) as part of a quality improvement initiative. A multidisciplinary team developed a PICU peripherally inserted central catheter evaluation tool to identify amenable patients and to suggest location and provider for procedure performance. Outcome, process, and balancing metrics were evaluated.</p>

<p><strong>MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: </strong>Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service placed 130 of 493 peripherally inserted central catheter (26%) resulting in 2,447 hospital central catheter days. A shift in bedside peripherally inserted central catheter centerline proportion occurred during both phases. Median time from order to catheter placement was reduced for peripherally inserted central catheters placed by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service compared with placement in interventional radiology (6 hr [interquartile range, 2-23 hr] vs 34 hr [interquartile range, 19-61 hr]; p &lt; 0.001). Successful access was achieved by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service providers in 96% of patients with central tip position in 97%. Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service central line-associated bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism rates were similar to rates for peripherally inserted central catheters placed in interventional radiology (all central line-associated bloodstream infection, 1.23 vs 2.18; p = 0.37 and venous thromboembolism, 1.63 vs 1.57; p = 0.91). Peripherally inserted central catheters in PICU patients had reduced in-hospital venous thromboembolism rate compared with PICU temporary catheter in PICU rate (1.59 vs 5.36; p &lt; 0.001).</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service implementation increased bedside peripherally inserted central catheter placement and employed a patient-centered and timely process. Balancing metrics including central line-associated bloodstream infection and venous thromboembolism rates were not significantly different between peripherally inserted central catheters placed by bedside peripherally inserted central catheter service and those placed in interventional radiology.</p>

DOI

10.1097/PCC.0000000000001739

Alternate Title

Pediatr Crit Care Med

PMID

30234675

WATCH THIS PAGE

Subscription is not available for this page.