Kidney transplant is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease as it offers significant survival and quality of life advantages over dialysis. While recent advances have significantly improved early graft outcomes, long-term overall graft survival has remained largely unchanged for the last 20 years. Due to the young age at which children receive their first transplant, most children will require multiple transplants during their lifetime. Each subsequent transplant becomes more difficult because of the development of donor specific HLA antibodies (dnDSA), thereby limiting the donor pool and increasing mortality and morbidity due to longer time on dialysis awaiting re-transplantation. Secondary prevention of dnDSA through increased post-transplant immunosuppression in children is constrained by a significant risk for viral and oncologic complications. There are currently no FDA-approved therapies that can meaningfully reduce dnDSA burden or improve long-term allograft outcomes. Therefore, primary prevention strategies aimed at reducing the risk of dnDSA formation would allow for the best possible long-term allograft outcomes without the adverse complications associated with over-immunosuppression. Epitope matching, which provides a more nuanced assessment of immunological compatibility between donor and recipient, offers the potential for improved donor selection. Although epitope matching is promising, it has not yet been readily applied in the clinical setting. Our review will describe current strengths and limitations of epitope matching software, the evidence for and against improved outcomes with epitope matching, discussion of eplet load vs. variable immunogenicity, and conclude with a discussion of the delicate balance of improving matching without disadvantaging certain populations.

TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HCT has been used with excellent outcomes in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies, and several studies have demonstrated rapid immune reconstitution in the nonmalignant setting. However, immune recovery following TCRαβ/CD19-depleted hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for malignancy remains incompletely elucidated. Furthermore, the majority of studies to date have used haploidentical and matched unrelated donors. Here we report results of immune reconstitution following TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HCT for hematologic malignancy in 51 pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies, the majority of whom received grafts from unrelated donors. Grafts were from matched unrelated (n = 20), mismatched unrelated (n = 20), and haploidentical (n = 11) donors. The median CD34 cell dose was 10.2 × 10/kg (range, 4.54 to 20 × 10/kg), and the median TCRαβ cell dose was 2.53 × 10/kg (range, 0 to 44.9 × 10/kg). Conditioning was myeloablative with either busulfan or total body irradiation, cyclophosphamide, and thiotepa. Thirty-three patients also received rabbit antithymocyte globulin. No prophylactic post-transplantation immune suppression was routinely given. Forty-three patients received rituximab on day +1 for recipient positive Epstein-Barr virus serology. Forty-nine patients (96%) engrafted with a median time to neutrophil recovery of 13 days (range, 8 to 30 days). Thirty-seven patients (73%) are alive at a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 6 to 50 months). Nine patients (18%) developed grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and 5 patients (11%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. Twenty-six patients (51%) experienced viral reactivation. T cell reconstitution was rapid with significant numbers of CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cells present on first assessment at 4 months post-HCT, and significant numbers of naïve CD4 T cells were present by 8 months post-HCT. Chronic GVHD was associated with delayed T cell recovery; however, T cell reconstitution was not affected by underlying diagnosis, donor source, TCRαβ T cell dose, conditioning regimen, or use of antithymocyte globulin. B cell recovery mirrored T cell recovery, and i.v. Ig was discontinued at a median of 8 months (range, 4 to 22 months) post-HCT in patients alive and relapse-free at last follow-up. Immune reconstitution is rapid following TCRαβ/CD19-depleted HCT in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. Donor graft source, haploidentical or unrelated, did not affect immune reconstitution. Viral reactivation is common in the first 100 days post-HCT, indicating that improved T cell defense is needed in the early post-HCT period.

Unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is associated with an increased risk of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). TCRαβ/CD19 depletion may reduce this risk, whereas maintaining graft-versus-leukemia. Outcome data with TCRαβ/CD19 depletion generally describe haploidentical donors, with relatively few URDs. We hypothesized that TCRαβ/CD19-depletion would attenuate the risks of GVHD and relapse for URD HSCT. Sixty pediatric and young adult (YA) patients with hematologic malignancies who lacked a matched-related donor were enrolled at 2 large pediatric transplantation centers between October 2014 and September 2019. All patients with acute leukemia had minimal residual disease testing, and DP typing was available for 77%. All patients received myeloablative total body irradiation- or busulfan-based conditioning with no posttransplant immune suppression. Engraftment occurred in 98%. Four-year overall survival was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52%-81%), and leukemia-free survival was 64% (95% CI, 48%-76%), with no difference between lymphoid and myeloid malignancies (P = .6297 and P = .5441, respectively). One patient (1.7%) experienced primary graft failure. Relapse occurred in 11 patients (3-year cumulative incidence, 21%; 95% CI, 11-34), and 8 patients (cumulative incidence, 15%; 95% CI, 6.7-26) experienced nonrelapse mortality. Grade III to IV acute GVHD was seen in 8 patients (13%), and 14 patients (26%) developed chronic GVHD, of which 6 (11%) had extensive disease. Nonpermissive DP mismatch was associated with higher likelihood of acute GVHD (odds ratio, 16.50; 95% CI, 1.67-163.42; P = .0166) but not with the development of chronic GVHD. URD TCRαβ/CD19-depleted peripheral HSCT is a safe and effective approach to transplantation for children/YAs with leukemia. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02323867.

<p>Most children who may benefit from stem cell transplantation lack matched related donors. Alternative donor transplantations with unrelated (URD) or partially matched related donors (PMRD) carry increased risks of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and mortality compared to matched related donor transplants. We hypothesized a strategy of partial CD3/CD19-depletion for URD or PMRD peripheral stem cell transplantation (PSCT) would attenuate risks of GVHD and mortality. We enrolled 84 pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin between April 2005 and February 2015 (NCT00579124: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00579124; NCT01071226: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01071226). Two (2.4%) experienced primary graft failure. Relapse occurred in 23 patients (27.4%; cumulative incidence 26.3%), and 17 patients (20.2%) experienced non-relapse mortality (NRM). Grade III-IV acute GVHD was observed in 18 patients (21.4%), and chronic GVHD was observed and graded as limited in 24 (35.3%) and extensive in 8 (11.7%). Three-year OS was 61.8% (95% CI 50.2 -71.4%) and EFS 52.0% (95% CI 40.3 - 62.4%). Age ≥15 years was associated with decreased OS (p=0.05) and EFS (p=0.05). Relapse was more common in children in second complete remission (p=0.03). Partially CD3-depleted alternative donor PSCT NRM, OS, and EFS compare favorably with previously published studies of T cell-replete PSCT. Historically, T cell-replete PSCTs have had a high ratio of extensive compared to limited chronic GVHD, which may explain the comparatively low relapse and NRM rates in our study despite similar overall rates of chronic GVHD. Partial T cell-depletion may expand donor options for children with malignant transplant indications lacking matched related donors by mitigating but not eliminating chronic GVHD.</p>

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Desensitization, the process of reducing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT), has unclear efficacy in pediatric HT candidates.</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>Pediatric HT candidates listed at our institution between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitization was defined as the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 10% with ≥ 1 a strong positive antibody. The desensitization response was defined as a ≥ 25% reduction in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for ≥ 90% of the strong positive antibodies on follow-up panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing before waitlist removal, HT, or death (data available for 13 patients).</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>The HT candidates were categorized as sensitized receiving desensitization therapy (ST, n = 14), sensitized not receiving therapy (SNT, n = 18), or non-sensitized (n = 55). A desensitization response was observed in 8 (62%) of the ST upon repeat PRA testing, with the ST responders receiving more doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (8 vs 2, p &lt; 0.05). The anti-HLA class I antibodies were particularly resistant for non-responders (p = 1.9 × 10). The combination of homograft and ventricular assist device was more sensitizing than either alone (p = 3.1 × 10). However, these sensitization risk factors did not impact the desensitization response. The ST was associated with a higher likelihood of remaining listed and a longer waitlist time without substantially impacting the HT rate, waitlist mortality, or early post-HT outcomes.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Most ST patients had a favorable response to desensitization, with a dose-dependent response observed for IVIG. The anti-HLA class likely impacts the ST response, whereas traditional sensitization risk factors had no impact on the response.</p>

<p>Complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) is used for evaluation of preformed HLA-specific antibodies in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) is a more sensitive assay and used with increasing frequency. To determine the clinical relevance of a positive FCXM in the context of negative CDCXM in heart transplantation, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to assess graft survival for three different patient cohorts defined by crossmatch results: T-cell and B-cell CDCXM+ ("CDCXM +" cohort), CDCXM- but T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM+ ("FCXM+" cohort), and T-cell/B-cell CDCXM- and FCXM- ("XM-" cohort). During the study period, 2,558 patients met inclusion criteria (10.7% CDCXM+, 18.8% FCXM+, 65.5% XM-). CDCXM+ patients had significantly decreased graft survival compared to FCXM+ and XM- cohorts (p=0.003 and &lt;0.001 respectively). CDCXM- and FCXM+ patients did not have decreased graft survival compared to XM- patients (p=0.09). In multivariate analysis, only CDCXM+ was associated with decreased graft survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.49). In conclusion, positive FCXM in the context of negative CDCXM does not confer increased risk of graft failure. Further study is needed to understand implications of CDCXM and FCXM testing in heart transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>