First name
NICHD
Middle name
Neonatal Research
Last name
Network

Title

Neurodevelopmental outcomes following neonatal late-onset sepsis and blood culture-negative conditions.

Year of Publication

2021

Date Published

2021 Jan 21

ISSN Number

1468-2052

Abstract

<p><strong>OBJECTIVE: </strong>Determine risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS) versus late-onset, antibiotic-treated, blood culture-negative conditions (LOCNC).</p>

<p><strong>DESIGN: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p>

<p><strong>SETTING: </strong>24 neonatal centres.</p>

<p><strong>PATIENTS: </strong>Infants born 1/1/2006-31/12/2014, at 22-26 weeks gestation, with birth weight 401-1000 g and surviving &gt;7 days were included. Infants with early-onset sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis, intestinal perforation or both LOS and LOCNC were excluded.</p>

<p><strong>EXPOSURES: </strong>LOS and LOCNC were defined as antibiotic administration for ≥5 days with and without a positive blood/cerebrospinal fluid culture, respectively. Infants with these diagnoses were also compared with infants with neither condition.</p>

<p><strong>OUTCOMES: </strong>Death or NDI was assessed at 18-26 months corrected age follow-up. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risks adjusting for covariates occurring ≤7 days of age.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Of 7354 eligible infants, 3940 met inclusion criteria: 786 (20%) with LOS, 1601 (41%) with LOCNC and 1553 (39%) with neither. Infants with LOS had higher adjusted relative risk (95% CI) for death/NDI (1.14 (1.05 to 1.25)) and death before follow-up (1.71 (1.44 to 2.03)) than those with LOCNC. Among survivors, risk for NDI did not differ between the two groups (0.99 (0.86 to 1.13)) but was higher for LOCNC infants (1.17 (1.04 to 1.31)) compared with unaffected infants.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Infants with LOS had higher risk of death, but not NDI, compared with infants with LOCNC. Surviving infants with LOCNC had higher risk of NDI compared with unaffected infants. Improving outcomes for infants with LOCNC requires study of the underlying conditions and the potential impact of antibiotic exposure.</p>

DOI

10.1136/archdischild-2020-320664

Alternate Title

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

PMID

33478957

Title

Identification of Extremely Premature Infants at Low Risk for Early-Onset Sepsis.

Year of Publication

2017

Date Published

2017 Oct 05

ISSN Number

1098-4275

Abstract

<p><strong>BACKGROUND: </strong>Premature infants are at high risk of early-onset sepsis (EOS) relative to term infants, and most are administered empirical antibiotics after birth. We aimed to determine if factors evident at birth could be used to identify premature infants at lower risk of EOS.</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>Study infants were born at 22 to 28 weeks' gestation in Neonatal Research Network centers from 2006 to 2014. EOS was defined by isolation of pathogenic species from blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture at ≤72 hours age. Infants were hypothesized as "low risk" for EOS when delivered via cesarean delivery, with membrane rupture at delivery, and absence of clinical chorioamnionitis. Frequency of prolonged antibiotics (≥5 days) was compared between low-risk infants and all others. Risks of mortality, EOS, and other morbidities were assessed by using regression models adjusted for center, race, antenatal steroid use, multiple birth, sex, gestation, and birth weight.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Of 15 433 infants, 5759 (37%) met low-risk criteria. EOS incidence among infants surviving &gt;12 hours was 29 out of 5640 (0.5%) in the low-risk group versus 209 out of 8422 (2.5%) in the comparison group (adjusted relative risk = 0.24 [95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.36]). Low-risk infants also had significantly lower combined risk of EOS or death ≤12 hours. Prolonged antibiotics were administered to 34% of low-risk infants versus 47% of comparison infants without EOS.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Delivery characteristics of extremely preterm infants can be used to identify those with significantly lower incidence of EOS. Recognition of differential risk may help guide decisions to limit early antibiotic use among approximately one-third of these infants.</p>

DOI

10.1542/peds.2017-0925

Alternate Title

Pediatrics

PMID

28982710

WATCH THIS PAGE

Subscription is not available for this page.