First name
Shelley
Middle name
D
Last name
Miyamoto

Title

The teammate trial: Study design and rationale tacrolimus and everolimus against tacrolimus and MMF in pediatric heart transplantation using the major adverse transplant event (MATE) score.

Year of Publication

2023

Number of Pages

100-112

Date Published

06/2023

ISSN Number

1097-6744

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently there are no immunosuppression regimens FDA-approved to prevent rejection in pediatric heart transplantation (HT). In recent years, everolimus (EVL) has emerged as a potential alternative to standard tacrolimus (TAC) as the primary immunosuppressant to prevent rejection that may also reduce the risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, the 2 regimens have never been compared head-to-head in a randomized trial. The study design and rationale are reviewed in light of the challenges inherent in rare disease research.

METHODS: The TEAMMATE trial (IND 127980) is the first multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) in pediatric HT. The primary purpose is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVL and low-dose TAC (LD-TAC) compared to standard-dose TAC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Children aged <21 years at HT were randomized (1:1 ratio) at 6 months post-HT to either regimen, and followed for 30 months. Children with recurrent rejection, multi-organ transplant recipients, and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m were excluded. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that, compared to TAC/MMF, EVL/LD-TAC is more effective in preventing 3 MATEs: acute cellular rejection (ACR), CKD and CAV. The primary safety hypothesis is that EVL/LD-TAC does not have a higher cumulative burden of 6 MATEs (antibody mediated rejection [AMR], infection, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [PTLD] in addition to the 3 above). The primary endpoint is the MATE score, a composite, ordinal surrogate endpoint reflecting the frequency and severity of MATEs that is validated against graft loss. The study had a target sample size of 210 patients across 25 sites and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of EVL/LD-TAC. Trial enrollment is complete and participant follow-up will be completed in 2023.

CONCLUSION: The TEAMMATE trial is the first multicenter RCT in pediatric HT. It is anticipated that the study will provide important information about the safety and efficacy of everolimus vs tacrolimus-based regimens and will provide valuable lessons into the design and conduct of future trials in pediatric HT.

DOI

10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.002

Alternate Title

Am Heart J

PMID

36828201
Featured Publication
No

Title

The teammate trial: Study design and rationale tacrolimus and everolimus against tacrolimus and MMF in pediatric heart transplantation using the major adverse transplant event (MATE) score.

Year of Publication

2023

Number of Pages

100-112

Date Published

06/2023

ISSN Number

1097-6744

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently there are no immunosuppression regimens FDA-approved to prevent rejection in pediatric heart transplantation (HT). In recent years, everolimus (EVL) has emerged as a potential alternative to standard tacrolimus (TAC) as the primary immunosuppressant to prevent rejection that may also reduce the risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, the 2 regimens have never been compared head-to-head in a randomized trial. The study design and rationale are reviewed in light of the challenges inherent in rare disease research.

METHODS: The TEAMMATE trial (IND 127980) is the first multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) in pediatric HT. The primary purpose is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVL and low-dose TAC (LD-TAC) compared to standard-dose TAC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Children aged <21 years at HT were randomized (1:1 ratio) at 6 months post-HT to either regimen, and followed for 30 months. Children with recurrent rejection, multi-organ transplant recipients, and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m were excluded. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that, compared to TAC/MMF, EVL/LD-TAC is more effective in preventing 3 MATEs: acute cellular rejection (ACR), CKD and CAV. The primary safety hypothesis is that EVL/LD-TAC does not have a higher cumulative burden of 6 MATEs (antibody mediated rejection [AMR], infection, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [PTLD] in addition to the 3 above). The primary endpoint is the MATE score, a composite, ordinal surrogate endpoint reflecting the frequency and severity of MATEs that is validated against graft loss. The study had a target sample size of 210 patients across 25 sites and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of EVL/LD-TAC. Trial enrollment is complete and participant follow-up will be completed in 2023.

CONCLUSION: The TEAMMATE trial is the first multicenter RCT in pediatric HT. It is anticipated that the study will provide important information about the safety and efficacy of everolimus vs tacrolimus-based regimens and will provide valuable lessons into the design and conduct of future trials in pediatric HT.

DOI

10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.002

Alternate Title

Am Heart J

PMID

36828201
Featured Publication
No

Title

Pediatric Heart Failure: An Evolving Public Health Concern.

Year of Publication

2019

Date Published

2019 Nov 15

ISSN Number

1097-6833

Abstract

<p>The care of children suffering from heart failure presents unique challenges that are inadequately met at the present time. In the pediatric population, a wide variety of disease processes can result in heart failure, including primary cardiomyopathy as well as an expanding population of children with palliated complex congenital heart disease (CHD). Regardless of the underlying etiology of heart failure, pediatric heart failure outcomes remain poor despite growing resource utilization. In addition, given the overlap in symptomatology between heart failure and more common childhood illnesses, the diagnosis of new onset heart failure in children requires a heightened level of suspicion in combination with early pediatric cardiology consultation. Emerging molecular evidence suggests that pediatric heart failure is distinct from adult heart failure, which may contribute to the limited efficacy of adult heart failure therapies in the children. Significant improvement in pediatric heart failure outcomes will require a shift in the approach to clinical and translation research (including support for pediatric-specific heart failure therapies) as well as widespread implementation of multidisciplinary teams to care for pediatric heart failure in a chronic disease model. Increased awareness among pediatricians, funding agencies, and policymakers regarding the obstacles facing pediatric patients with heart failure is critical to meeting the needs of this complex patient population.</p>

DOI

10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.049

Alternate Title

J. Pediatr.

PMID

31740144

WATCH THIS PAGE

Subscription is not available for this page.