<p>Our objective was to examine refugees' acute care use early in resettlement. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of acute care use, emergency room and hospital visits, by adult refugees arriving in Southern Connecticut between 2/1/2013 and 2/1/2015. We examined associations between any acute care use and collected demographic as well as health characteristics. Of the 248 refugees in our sample, 57% had a medical evaluation within 30 days of arrival. 102 (41%) had at least one acute care visit within 8 months of arrival. Male sex (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.09-3.30) and prior history of hypertension (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.06-7.33) were associated with greater likelihood of an acute care visit within 8 months of arrival, while having a medical evaluation within 30 days of arrival was associated with lower likelihood (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98). Designing systems to ensure timely evaluations of newly arrived refugees may reduce frequent acute care utilization.</p>

<p>Children in immigrant families are less likely to screen positive with the Children with Special Health Care Needs Screener (CSHCN-S). This may indicate that children in immigrant families are healthier or require fewer health services than non-immigrant peers. Alternatively, the screener may under-identify special healthcare needs in this population. Using the 2011-2012 National Survey of Children's Health, we examined the prevalence of a positive CSHCN-S among children from first, second, and third generation households with an equivalent number of currently diagnosed chronic conditions (0, 1, 2+). Multivariate analyses controlled for sociodemographic factors. Among children with an equivalent number of chronic conditions, fewer children from first and second generation households screened positive with the CSHCN-S relative to children from third generation households. This association remained after adjusting for covariates. The CSHCN Screener may under-identify children from immigrant households, allowing for missed opportunities to allocate health resources.</p>

<p><strong>OBJECTIVES: </strong>To evaluate publicly available data sets to determine their utility for studying refugee health.</p>

<p><strong>METHODS: </strong>We searched for keywords describing refugees in data sets within the Society of General Internal Medicine Dataset Compendium and the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research database. We included in our analysis US-based data sets with publicly available documentation and a self-defined, health-related focus that allowed for an examination of patient-level factors.</p>

<p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Of the 68 data sets that met the study criteria, 37 (54%) registered keyword matches related to refugees, but only 2 uniquely identified refugees.</p>

<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Few health data sets identify refugee status among participants, presenting barriers to understanding refugees' health and health care needs. Public Health Implications. Information about refugee status in national health surveys should include expanded demographic questions and focus on mental health and chronic disease. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 19, 2016: e1-e2. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303201).</p>