The teammate trial: Study design and rationale tacrolimus and everolimus against tacrolimus and MMF in pediatric heart transplantation using the major adverse transplant event (MATE) score.

2023

100-112

06/2023

1097-6744

BACKGROUND: Currently there are no immunosuppression regimens FDA-approved to prevent rejection in pediatric heart transplantation (HT). In recent years, everolimus (EVL) has emerged as a potential alternative to standard tacrolimus (TAC) as the primary immunosuppressant to prevent rejection that may also reduce the risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, the 2 regimens have never been compared head-to-head in a randomized trial. The study design and rationale are reviewed in light of the challenges inherent in rare disease research.

METHODS: The TEAMMATE trial (IND 127980) is the first multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) in pediatric HT. The primary purpose is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVL and low-dose TAC (LD-TAC) compared to standard-dose TAC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Children aged <21 years at HT were randomized (1:1 ratio) at 6 months post-HT to either regimen, and followed for 30 months. Children with recurrent rejection, multi-organ transplant recipients, and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m were excluded. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that, compared to TAC/MMF, EVL/LD-TAC is more effective in preventing 3 MATEs: acute cellular rejection (ACR), CKD and CAV. The primary safety hypothesis is that EVL/LD-TAC does not have a higher cumulative burden of 6 MATEs (antibody mediated rejection [AMR], infection, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [PTLD] in addition to the 3 above). The primary endpoint is the MATE score, a composite, ordinal surrogate endpoint reflecting the frequency and severity of MATEs that is validated against graft loss. The study had a target sample size of 210 patients across 25 sites and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of EVL/LD-TAC. Trial enrollment is complete and participant follow-up will be completed in 2023.

CONCLUSION: The TEAMMATE trial is the first multicenter RCT in pediatric HT. It is anticipated that the study will provide important information about the safety and efficacy of everolimus vs tacrolimus-based regimens and will provide valuable lessons into the design and conduct of future trials in pediatric HT.

10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.002

Am Heart J

36828201

The teammate trial: Study design and rationale tacrolimus and everolimus against tacrolimus and MMF in pediatric heart transplantation using the major adverse transplant event (MATE) score.

2023

100-112

06/2023

1097-6744

BACKGROUND: Currently there are no immunosuppression regimens FDA-approved to prevent rejection in pediatric heart transplantation (HT). In recent years, everolimus (EVL) has emerged as a potential alternative to standard tacrolimus (TAC) as the primary immunosuppressant to prevent rejection that may also reduce the risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, the 2 regimens have never been compared head-to-head in a randomized trial. The study design and rationale are reviewed in light of the challenges inherent in rare disease research.

METHODS: The TEAMMATE trial (IND 127980) is the first multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) in pediatric HT. The primary purpose is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVL and low-dose TAC (LD-TAC) compared to standard-dose TAC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Children aged <21 years at HT were randomized (1:1 ratio) at 6 months post-HT to either regimen, and followed for 30 months. Children with recurrent rejection, multi-organ transplant recipients, and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m were excluded. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that, compared to TAC/MMF, EVL/LD-TAC is more effective in preventing 3 MATEs: acute cellular rejection (ACR), CKD and CAV. The primary safety hypothesis is that EVL/LD-TAC does not have a higher cumulative burden of 6 MATEs (antibody mediated rejection [AMR], infection, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder [PTLD] in addition to the 3 above). The primary endpoint is the MATE score, a composite, ordinal surrogate endpoint reflecting the frequency and severity of MATEs that is validated against graft loss. The study had a target sample size of 210 patients across 25 sites and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of EVL/LD-TAC. Trial enrollment is complete and participant follow-up will be completed in 2023.

CONCLUSION: The TEAMMATE trial is the first multicenter RCT in pediatric HT. It is anticipated that the study will provide important information about the safety and efficacy of everolimus vs tacrolimus-based regimens and will provide valuable lessons into the design and conduct of future trials in pediatric HT.

10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.002

Am Heart J

36828201

The TEAMMATE Trial: Study Design and Rationale of the First Pediatric Heart Transplant Randomized Clinical Trial.

2020

S207-S208

2020 Apr

1557-3117

<p><b>PURPOSE: </b>Currently there are no-FDA approved immunosuppressants specific to pediatric heart transplantation (HT). In recent years, everolimus (EVL) has emerged as an alternative to tacrolimus (TAC) as a primary immunosuppressant to prevent rejection that may also prevent kidney and coronary disease. However, the two regimens have never been evaluated systematically.</p><p><b>METHODS: </b>The TEAMMATE Trial (IND 127980) is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EVL and low-dose (LD-TAC) compared to standard-therapy TAC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). The study design and rationale are reviewed in light of challenges inherent in rare disease research.</p><p><b>RESULTS: </b>The TEAMMATE trial is the first multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) in pediatric HT. The primary purpose is to evaluate the risk-benefit profile of the two regimens to prevent major adverse transplant events (MATE), and to support FDA approval of 1 or both regimens for pediatric HT. Children <21 years at HT will be randomized (1:1 ratio) at 6 mo. post-HT to either regimen for 30 months (Figure). Children with recurrent rejection or a GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 are excluded. The primary efficacy hypothesis is that compared to TAC/MMF, EVL/LD-TAC is more effective in preventing 3 MATEs: cellular rejection, CKD and CAV. The primary safety hypothesis is that EVL/LD-TAC does not have a higher cumulative burden of 6 MATE (AMR, infection, and PTLD + the 3 above). The primary endpoint is the MATE Score, a surrogate endpoint reflecting the frequency and severity of MATEs and validated against graft loss. The study will enroll 210 patients across 26 sites and is powered to demonstrate superior efficacy of EVL/LDTAC. The trial is projected to be completed in 2022.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION: </b>The TEAMMATE trial is the first RCT in pediatric HT. It is anticipated that the study will provide important information about the safety and effectiveness of EVL and TAC and provide valuable lessons into the design and conduct of future trials in pediatric HT.</p>

10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.825

J. Heart Lung Transplant.

32465073