OBJECTIVE: To examine how height and youth as well as parenting characteristics associate with quality of life (QoL) and self-esteem among healthy youth undergoing growth evaluation with growth hormone (GH) testing .

STUDY DESIGN: Healthy youth, age 8-14 years, undergoing provocative GH testing, and a parent completed surveys at or around the time of testing. Surveys collected demographic data; youth and parent reports of youth health-related QoL; youth reports of self-esteem, coping skills, social support, and parental autonomy support; and parent reports of perceived environmental threats and achievement goals for their child. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. Univariate models and multivariable linear regressions were used to identify factors associated with QoL and self-esteem.

RESULTS: Sixty youth (mean height Z-score -2.18 ± 0.61) and their parents participated. On multivariable modeling, youth perceptions of their physical QoL associated with higher grade in school, greater friend and classmate support, and older parent age; youth psychosocial QoL with greater friend and classmate support, and with less disengaged coping; and youth height-related QoL and parental perceptions of youth psychosocial QoL with greater classmate support. Youth self-esteem associated with greater classmate support and taller mid-parental height. Youth height was not associated with QoL or self-esteem outcomes in multivariable regression.

CONCLUSIONS: Perceived social support and coping skills, rather than height, were related to QoL and self-esteem in healthy short youth and may serve as an important potential area for clinical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Boys outnumber girls in short stature evaluations and growth hormone treatment despite absence of gender differences in short stature prevalence. Family views on short stature influence medical management, but gender-based analysis of these views is lacking. This study explored endocrine patients' and their parents' perceptions of short stature and its impact on quality of life by patient gender.

METHODS: Patients aged 8 to 14 years undergoing provocative growth hormone testing and 1 parent each completed semistructured interviews. Clinical data were extracted by chart review.

RESULTS: Twenty-four patient-parent dyads (6 female patients, 22 mothers; predominantly non-Hispanic White) participated. Six major themes emerged: (1) patients' perceptions of their short stature were similar by gender, (2) physical experiences of short stature were similar by gender, (3) social experiences of short stature were both similar and different by gender, (4) parental perceptions of short stature as a factor limiting their child's functionality were similar by gender, (5) concern about societal stigma related to short stature arose for both genders, and (6) patients' perceptions of parental messaging about the import of their short stature were similar by gender.

CONCLUSION: Our data reveal more similarities than differences between genders in patient perceptions and patient and parent-reported experiences of short stature. Worry about stature-related stigma was noted for patients of both genders. Parental messaging about short stature emerged as an important area to explore further by patient gender. Our findings suggest that clinicians should be wary of making gender or stigma-based assumptions when evaluating children with short stature.

OBJECTIVE: Boys outnumber girls in short stature evaluations and growth hormone treatment despite absence of gender differences in short stature prevalence. Family views on short stature influence medical management, but gender-based analysis of these views is lacking. This study explored endocrine patients' and their parents' perceptions of short stature and its impact on quality of life by patient gender.

METHODS: Patients aged 8-14 years undergoing provocative growth hormone testing and one parent each completed semi-structured interviews. Clinical data were extracted by chart review.

RESULTS: 24 patient-parent dyads (6 female patients, 22 mothers; predominantly non-Hispanic White) participated. Six major themes emerged: 1) patients' perceptions of their short stature were similar by gender, 2) physical experiences of short stature were similar by gender, 3) social experiences of short stature were both similar and different by gender, 4) parental perceptions of short stature as a factor limiting their child's functionality were similar by gender, 5) concern about societal stigma related to short stature arose for both genders, and 6) patients' perceptions of parental messaging about the import of their short stature were similar by gender.

CONCLUSION: Our data reveal more similarities than differences between genders in patient perceptions and patient and parent-reported experiences of short stature. Worry about stature-related stigma was noted for patients of both genders. Parental messaging about short stature emerged as an important area to explore further by patient gender. Our findings suggest that clinicians should be wary of making gender or stigma-based assumptions when evaluating children with short stature.